Knellinger v. York Street Property Development, LP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
We consider here defendant City of Philadelphia’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. Rule. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The City of Philadelphia (“City”) asks that we dismiss with prejudice the federal law claims asserted against it and remand the remainder of the case to state *466court. Plaintiffs oppose the City’s motion and request, should we find certain defects in their Complaint, that they be allowed to cure them.
We have jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
II. Standard of Review
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Keener v. HribalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Vanderklok v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- 3909 REALTY LLC, ETAL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPT. OF LICENSES & INSPECTIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Ankney v. Paradise TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Bartnicki v. Scranton School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.