Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1998No. CV-97-0134-PRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

953 P.2d 168 (1998)

191 Ariz. 128

Jose SANCHEZ, a minor child, By and Through his guardian ad litem, Craig GORDON; Teresa E. Barocio; Daniel Sanchez, Plaintiffs/Appellants.

v.

The CITY OF TUCSON, a political entity, Defendant/Appellee.

No. CV-97-0134-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

February 5, 1998.

Miller, Pitt & McAnally, P.C. by Thomas G. Cotter, Lindsay Brew, Tucson, for Jose Sanchez.

Lopez, Bevans & Perez-Medrano by Juan Perez-Medrano, Tucson, for Teresa E. Barocio and Daniel Sanchez.

Gabroy, Rollman & Bosse, P.C. by Richard A. Brown, Richard M. Rollman, Tucson, for City of Tucson.

OPINION

MOE…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API