Legal Opinion

Barringer v. Stoltz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Ramsey county, where the action was tried before Wilkin, J., and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action to recover commissions alleged to have been earned by plaintiffs as real-estate brokers, in the sale of property belonging to defendant. Upon a trial before a jury, plaintiffs had a verdict. A case was then duly made and settled, judgment entered for the amount of the verdict, with interest, etc., and from the judgment defendant appeals. Four distinct assignments of error are specified in appellant’s brief, the first of which, that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, cannot avail, because no motion for a new trial has been made in the court below. Unless this be done the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hegenmyer v. MarksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Byrne v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larson v. ThomaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Donohue v. PaddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API