Legal Opinion
Harpster v. Sullivan
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 8, 1991No. Civ. A. 86-1970Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
We have before us plaintiffs motion for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). For the reasons set forth below, we must deny this motion on the ground that it is untimely.
Background
Plaintiff filed a complaint on November 14, 1986, seeking judicial review of a decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denying her application for disability benefits. Plaintiff and the Secretary filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In an order dated January 30, 1987, we denied the cross-motions for summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Welter v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Edward Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.