Legal Opinion

Mulder v. Rockland Armor & Metal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*316The appellants were only nine days in default in answering in this case when they made a motion to dismiss the complaint under CPLR 3016 (b). Although the Supreme Court properly denied the motion as being untimely, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to have granted the plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to enter a default judgment.

In view of the relatively short period of the delay, the absence of any claim of prejudice to the plaintiff, the existence of a possible meritorious defense, the absence of any willfulness on the appellants’ part and the public policy in favor of resolving…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNeill v. LasalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robles v. Grace Episcopal ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Yongjie Xu v. JJW Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Bernardo v. USAir Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Two Catherine Street Management Co. v. Yam Keung YeungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API