Legal Opinion

Bernardo v. USAir Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: The court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the default, namely, the loss of the litigation file on the day the summons was received by *643defendant’s in-house legal department (cf., Tiger v Town of Bolton, 150 AD2d 889 [holding that defendant’s loss of summons in mailing it to insurer constitutes reasonable excuse]). There is no indication that defendant intended to abandon the action,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Klenk v. KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Tiger v. Town of BoltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Claim of Leeds v. County of WestchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Mulder v. Rockland Armor & Metal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mayville v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Massachusetts Asset Financing Corp. v. DiLauraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. St. Charles Hospital & Rehabilitation Center v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API