Legal Opinion

Anderson County Commissioners v. Beal

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1885No. 851PublishedCited by 85 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. This was an action at law, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas, by Thomas P. Beal, against the . Board of County Commissioners of the County of Anderson, in the State of Kansas, to. recover the amount of 90 coupons for $70 each due January 1,1881, and the same amount due January 1, 1882. The coupons were cut from bonds alike except as to their numbers, of…

Read the full summary

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE KANSAS. This was an action at law, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas, by Thomas P. Beal, against the . Board of County Commissioners of the County of Anderson, in the State of Kansas, to. recover the amount of 90 coupons for $70 each due January 1,1881, and the same amount due January 1, 1882. The coupons were cut from bonds alike except as to their numbers, of the following form: “ No.-. County of Anderson. 1,000. United States of America, State of Kansas. Know all men by these…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

He recited the facts, as above stated, and continued:

It is not disputed that the recital, in the bond, that it was issued under the act of February 26,1866, Sess. Laws of Kansas, 1866, ch. 24, p. 72, was an error. That act authorized county subscriptions to the stock of railroad companies, when authorized' by a majority of the votes cast at a county election, if' twenty days’ notice of the election had first been given “ in some newspaper published and having general circulation in the county, or, in case there be no paper published in the county, then by written or printed notices posted up…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Hendrick v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API