Legal Opinion

Nott-Atwater Co. v. Berry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1927No. 20655. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation, brought this suit against the defendants, doing business under the trade name of Penn Oil Company, claiming that, in pursuance of an oral contract, it sold to them certain lubricating oil, and that there was a balance due of $833.52. The defendants answered, claiming certain credits and offsets, and the cause was tried to the court with a jury.

Both sides admit that the arrangements made and the contract entered into, whatever its terms, was oral. There seems to be little dispute about many of the salient features of the contract, which provided that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osgood v. Bauder & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. West v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hansen v. Consumers' Steam Heating Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. State v. TerrienWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Longfellow v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacks v. BlazerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. United Truck Lines, Inc. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hildebrand v. HildebrandWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API