Legal Opinion
Adler v. Londner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
*1004On this appeal, plaintiff in this automobile negligence action is seeking to have the jury’s verdict awarding her $20,000 for past pain and suffering and $10,000 for future pain and suffering set aside on the ground of inadequacy.
A verdict may be successfully challenged as against the weight of the evidence only when " ' "the evidence so preponderated] in favor of the [plaintiff] that [the verdict] could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” ’ ” (Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746, quoting Moffatt v Moffatt, 86 AD2d 864, affd 62 NY2d 875). Moreover, when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Moffatt v. MoffattNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moffatt v. MoffattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Nelson v. Town of GlenvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duncan v. HillebrandtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Jaquay v. AveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hamlin v. McTigheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Stanton v. Price Chopper Operating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997