Legal Opinion

People v. SUCIC

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 2010No. 1-08-0371PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

Following a bench trial, defendant Zlatan Sucic was convicted of cyberstalking, harassment through electronic communication, and stalking. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of three years in prison for each count. On appeal, defendant contends that: (1) the cyberstalking statute (720 ILCS 5/2 — 7.5(a)(1) (West 2008)) violated his first amendment right to free speech and is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague; (2) his convictions for cyberstalking and harassment through electronic communication violate the one-act, one-crime rule; (3) the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. GoodwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. Huon v. Breaking Media, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. DiomedesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. People v. CrawfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API