Legal Opinion

Lohman v. Lohman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1946No. L. A. 19299Published

1Opinion of the Court

29 Cal.2d 144 (1946)

JENNIE A. LOHMAN, Appellant,

v.

THEODORE G. LOHMAN, Defendant; ZALLA LOHMAN, as Executrix, etc., Respondent.

L. A. No. 19299.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 18, 1946.

Freston & Files, H. R. Kelly, Sydney Wetzler and Bion B. Vogel for Appelelant.

McLaughlin & McGinley and Howard D. Hanson for Respondent.

EDMONDS, J.

At the time of the death of Theodore G. Lohman, he had not paid the amounts specified in a property settlement agreement whose provisions were approved by the court and included in both the interlocutory and the final decree of divorce obtained by Jennie A.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API