Colburn v. Burlingame
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of requiring defendant, Leora W. Burlingame, to render an account of property which had come into her possession under the will of her deceased husband, it being alleged in the complaint (indirectly, it is true) that her. interest therein is a life estate limited to certain purposes, and that certain expenditures being made by her are not within those purposes. The relief asked also included an injunction to restrain said defendant permanently from selling, disposing of, or encumbering any of the corpus of said estate, which consists entirely of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardy v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Allen v. HirlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Kennedy v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Good v. Fichthorn, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Braley v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Buder v. FranzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- In Re Robinson's WillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.