Legal Opinion
Scarpelli v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1957No. 12083PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKINSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201, to determine the rights of the parties under a public liability insurance policy.
There is no controversy as to the facts. The record discloses that the plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter referred to as the Scarpellis) operate a retail meat market in Chicago, Illinois. Sometime prior to July 29,1956 they employed one Joseph Chavez to work for them in their market. Chavez, who at that time was fifteen years of age, was operating power machinery for the Scarpellis and was therefore employed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Cross v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Roszek v. Bauerle & Stark Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Landry v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Keehn v. Excess Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scarpelli v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Nathan Ginsberg, a Minor by Sam Ginsberg, His Father and Next Friend v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., of Chicago, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961