Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. L.H.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 2011Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Long

I am in agreement with the ultimate conclusion that defendant is not entitled to gap-time credits. I write separately to express my view that there is no overlap requirement in the gap-time statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:44-5(b)(2), and to set forth a separate rationale for denying gap-time credits—the impossibility of prosecutorial manipulation.

*529I.

The gap-time statute provides that “when a person is sentenced at different times for two offenses, both committed prior to the sentencing on the first, he is to be given credit against the aggregate of both sentences for any time served on the first.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. GelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. State v. CarrekerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. Booker v. New Jersey State Parole BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API