Legal Opinion

Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2004No. 03-5055PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (“Cherokee Nation”) and Delaware Tribe of Indians (“Delawares”) entered into a contract pursuant to a treaty negotiated between the Cherokee Nation and the United States Government. The Supreme Court has twice interpreted that contract. We must decide in this case whether the Department of Interior’s (“DOI”) interpretation of that contract and concomitant decision to extend Federal recognition to the Delawares is contrary to the Supreme Court’s reading of the same document.

I

The law governing Federal recognition of an Indian tribe is,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. BNSF Railway Co. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. ReevesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Rags Over the Arkansas River, Inc. v. Colorado Parks & Wildlife BoardColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API