Rathburn v. Sussman Bros. Co. (Et Al.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The claimant’s husband, Joseph A. Rathburn, was employed by Sussman Brothers & Company, the defendants, as night watchman at a scrap or junk yard con ducted by them. The yard contained considerable quantities of machinery, scrap iron and other waste materials.
On November 9, 1934, Rathburn was inside a small shanty on the premises of his employers, in the regular course of his duties as watchman, when three young men, all of whom were armed with guns (revolvers), approached and ordered him out of the shanty. As Rathburn came out of the door of the shanty, he was told to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Maguire v. James Lees & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- O'Rourke v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Keyes v. New York, Ontario & Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hunter v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Dolan v. Linton's LunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959