Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Tauber

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 22, 1970No. [No. 349, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, Robert L. Goldman, et al., sought an injunction restraining appellees, Charles L. Tauber, et al., from continuing with certain construction work on their property and improving or modifying it, contending that it was in violation of the zoning ordinance. It was their contention that there was no lawful nonconforming use for the property and, if there were a nonconforming use, that appellees proposed an unlawful extension of a nonconforming use.

The appeal from the decree of the chancellor dismissing the bill of complaint was entered on September 10, 1969. An order was obtained in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. Reed-Avery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Horseman v. FurbushCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Agnoli v. Powers, AssigneesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Presstman v. FineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacober v. High Hill Realty, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Purvis v. Forrest Street ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Rossen & Cohen v. NovakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Uhler v. Real Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API