Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Hotchkiss
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Or, in The Alternative, to Stay Proceedings filed January 18, 2000. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of this motion. For reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion and dismisses Plaintiffs’ civil action without prejudice.
Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiffs are Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., a Michigan corporation with its principal place…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mission Insurance Company v. Puritan Fashions CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Fire Insurance v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000