Legal Opinion
In Re Reynold Henatsch
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 13, 1962No. 6716PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
The Board of Appeals, in its opinion of March 7, 1960, affirmed the rejection by the examiner of claims 11 and 15-21, inclusive, of appellant’s application Ser. No. 362,783 filed June 19, 1953, on a sidewalk canopy. The rejection is based on the following references:
Hohorst, 405,475, June 18,1889.
Greenwald, 405,549, June 18, 1889.
Firguson, 1,796,564, Mar. 17, 1931.
Pollard (British), 482,911, Apr. 7,1938.
Upon applicant’s petition for rehearing, this decision was adhered to.
The issue presented is: Do claims 11 and 15-21, inclusive, particularly point out and distinctly claim, as required by 35…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re AllattCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- In re TibonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In Re C.A. QueenerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re C.A. QueenerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986