Legal Opinion
Kruse v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1956No. Civ. 5150PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
On October 11, 1950, plaintiffs, who owned a house and lot on Whitman Street in San Diego, listed their property for sale with one G. T. Garrity, a licensed real estate broker. The defendant, who was also a licensed real estate broker, with the permission and at the request of Garrity, showed the property to George 0. Carter and his wife. The Carters were interested in buying the house if it could be enlarged and on or about October 11, 1950, after they had inspected the interior of the building, Carter asked Miller if the lot was a “filled lot” and Miller said “No.” Carter then told Miller…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vance v. Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal BrotherhoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by14 opinions
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Wall v. SwilleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.