Legal Opinion

Burns v. Georgetown University Medical Center

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 14, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2013-0898Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTOINETTE BURNS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 13-898 (CKK) v. MATTHEW D. LEVY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 (March 14, 2019) Defendants Matthew D. Levy and Medstar Georgetown University Hospital (the “Hospital”) 2 invoke the peer review privilege in this jurisdiction to shield themselves from Plaintiff Antoinette Burns’ claim of negligent defamation. 3 Because the Court finds that the United States Air Force entities to which Defendants provided certain information about Plaintiff do not qualify as “peer review bodies”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API