Legal Opinion
Cooper v. Ambassador Personnel, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided August 11, 2008No. Civil Action 3:06cv138-MHTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The issue before the court is whether, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e through 2000e-17, plaintiff Lauren Cooper is entitled to declaratory relief, injunctive relief, attorney’s fees, and court costs from defendant Ambassador Personnel, Inc. on the following mixed-motive jury findings: that Cooper’s pregnancy was a motivating factor in Ambassador’s decision to terminate her but that the company would have fired her anyway. Based on these findings, the court immediately after trial denied all relief…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barry C. Cosgrove, Cross-Appellee v. Joseph Bartolotta and Mary-Bart, Llc, Doing Business as Bartolotta's Lake Park BistroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- HCSC-Laundry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regina FITZGERALD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIRLOIN STOCKADE, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mercer v. State of Alabama Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Saulsberry v. Savannah River Remediation, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- Stacey-Suggs v. Board of RegentsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014