Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of J.R.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 2003No. C2-02-378Published
1Opinion of the Court
655 N.W.2d 1 (2003)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF J.R., Jr., and A.I.R.
No. C2-02-378.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 9, 2003.
Brian M. Olsen, Cokato, MN, for Appellant.
Michael J. Thompson, Meeker County Attorney, Gayle A. Borchert, Assistant County Attorney, Litchfield, MN, for Respondent.
Kathryn J. Bergstrom, Christopher A. Carlisle, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, Guardian At Litem.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant, the mother of J.R., Jr. and A.I.R., appeals an order of the Minnesota Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.