Legal Opinion

Raht v. Union Consolidated Mining Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM POLK. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Benton. W. E. Cooper, Ch., presiding by interchange.

1Opinion of the Court

JORDAN Stokes, Sp. J.,

delivered the opinion of •the court.

It is apparent from a careful examination of the record that the parties have spared no labor or pains ■in the preparation of the case in the inferior court. They have furnished us with a large mass of proof, ■both oral and documentary, upon all the issues in the pleadings, as well as a large amount which lies outside • of any issue legitimately presented. The arguments • of learned counsel on both sides have displayed great ability and legal learning and research, and have bee*» full and exhaustive upon all the questions of law and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weed v. SmullNew York Court of Chancery · 1839

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,643 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Washington County Utility District, Wade H. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. McNeill v. Dobson-Bainbridge, Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Heard v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  5. Bell v. StrauchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API