Legal Opinion

Marlin Dean Hoyt and Robert Frederick Mall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 1958No. 5759_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Hoyt and Mall contend that the trial court erroneously denied them relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from sentences imposed for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. They assert that they were deprived of their constitutional rights when the court denied their motions, made prior to sentence, for permission to withdraw pleas of guilty and to enter pleas of not guilty.

At their arraignment on January 14, 1957, appellants appeared with retained counsel. At that time they stood mute. On February 7, 1957, they were again before the court with their counsel and each…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Sullivan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Bergen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. William Sterling Rosecrans, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. BentvenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Ezequial Frank Lopez Vasquez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. James M. Criser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API