Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Iheanacho
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 17, 2022No. 3:17-cv-00401-JRUnknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CITY OF PORTLAND, Case No. 3:17-cv-00401-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. CHARLES IHEANACHO and CHERYL D. IHEANACHO, individuals, Defendants. _________________________________ RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Defendants Charles and Cheryl Iheanacho move for attorney fees and costs in the amounts of $93,135.88 and $2,823.15, respectively, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and
Or. Rev. Stat. § 20.077. Plaintiff the City of Portland (“City”) also moves for attorney fees and costs but only to offset defendants’ award should they be adjudged the “prevailing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. GayeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Cadkin v. LooseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.