Legal Opinion
Shum v. Intel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 2010No. 2010-1109PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1363Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This appeal reviews an award of costs in a case where no party prevailed on every claim. The underlying action was filed by an optical engineer named Frank Shum (“Shum”). Shum sought correction of inventorship for seven patents originally issued to his former business partner, Jean-Marc Verdiell (“VerdieU”), arguing that he, Shum, should be named as the sole inventor or co-inventor. See 35 U.S.C. § 256. Shum also asserted numerous claims under California law, all of which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Williams v. GayeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ssl Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Royal Palm Properties, LLC v. Pink Palm Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- East Iowa Plastics, Inc. v. PI, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Shum v. Intel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.