Legal Opinion
Hafferman v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-2634PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court upon dispositive motions by defendants. Defendant Westinghouse has filed a renewed motion to dismiss the claim against it based on the recent Supreme Court decision in Schiavone v. Fortune, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2379, 91 L.Ed.2d 18 (1986). Defendant Hilton Hotels has filed a separate motion for summary judgment. After considering these motions, the underlying papers, counsels’ statements at oral argument, and the entire record in this case, this court will deny Westinghouse’s motion to dismiss and grant Hilton Hotels’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Joseph v. Elan Motorsports Technologies Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. LiedekerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. Cyklop Strapping Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Ryan Crostley v. Lamar County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Dorothy Schrader v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., Royal Caribbean Ltd., and Royal Caribbean Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.