Legal Opinion

Parker v. Stetson-Ross MacH. Co. Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 15, 1977No. Civ. 74-4059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

-NICHOL, Chief Judge.

The motion before the Court concerns only the third party plaintiff and the third party defendant in this action. Third party defendant Guerdon Industries has moved the Court for the dismissal of third party plaintiff Stetson-Ross’ complaint, or in the alternative, for summary judgment on the claim presented therein. The facts are essentially as follows. On October 28, 1971, George D. Parker sustained serious injuries while operating a power saw manufactured by defendant Stetson-Ross, and distributed by defendant King & Priest. Parker was paid workers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Carlson v. SmogardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Sunspan Eng. & Const. Co. v. SPRING-LOCK SCAFFOLD. CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Avera St. Luke's Hospital v. KaramaliDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
  3. McClellan v. PooleDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988
  4. Stringfellow v. ReedDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  5. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, Inc. v. Swift Brothers Construction Company and Egger Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API