Maytag Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.,
The United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers International Union and Local 997 (collectively, the UAW or the Union) appeal the district court 1 judgment after a five-day bench trial declaring that Whirlpool Corporation may unilaterally modify the health care benefits it provides to retired hourly workers previously employed at the Newton, Iowa manufacturing facilities of Whirlpool’s now-dissolved subsidiary, Maytag Corporation. The issues on appeal are whether an Article III case or controversy existed when Whirlpool filed its declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Home Instead, Inc. v. David FloranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Matthew Kuhns v. Scottrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- McGowen, Hurst, Clark & Smith v. Commerce BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Agred Foundation v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.