Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Emporium Videos

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1993No. 92-141Published

1Opinion of the Court

848 P.2d 237 (1993)

Richard B. OSBORN, Appellant (Plaintiff),

v.

EMPORIUM VIDEOS; Arthur Greer, Owner; and Ron Sullivan, Manager/Agent, Appellees (Defendants).

No. 92-141.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

March 11, 1993.

Richard B. Osborn, pro se.

No appearance representing appellees.

Before MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, URBIGKIT,[*] and GOLDEN, JJ.

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Challenging the propriety of the sua sponte dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, Richard B. Osborn (Osborn) appeals the district court's order. We hold that the procedure used by the district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API