Legal Opinion

Plymouth Woods Corp. v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1962No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The defendants in this case, Homer C. and Bette A. Maxwell, placed a For Sale sign on their property in Rosemont, Delaware County. Their predecessor in title, the Plymouth Woods Corporation, has asked the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County to enjoin the exhibition of such a sign. At first blush this might seem to be a high-handed demand since the owners of property have the right to advertise the sale of their property as they see fit.

Plymouth, however, seeks an injunction to prohibit the sign planting because of a provision in the agreement of sale…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Harmon v. BurowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Dick Et Ux., to Use v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. The Haig Corp. v. Thomas S. Gassner Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Mint Realty Co. v. WanamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Binenstock TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Burns v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Boiling Spring Lakes Division of Reeves Telecom Corp. v. Coastal Services Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Westfield Homes, Inc. v. HerrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Rodes & De Szirmay v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API