Legal Opinion
Stahl v. United States
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 25, 2009No. CV-08-170-FVSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FRED VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court based upon cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff is represented by Gary C. Randall, James J. Workland, and Eric J. Sachtjen. The defendant is represented by Jennifer D. Auchterlonie and W. Carl Hankla. 1
A
John Stahl belongs to a religious corporation whose members live communally and hold their property in common. The corporation is not required to pay federal income tax. 26 U.S.C. § 501(d) (establishing an exemption for “[r]eligious ... corporations ... [that] ...…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Interstate Transit Lines v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Professional & Executive Leasing, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Petitioner v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stahl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010