Professional & Executive Leasing, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Petitioner v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Professional & Executive Leasing, Inc. (PEL) appeals a decision by the tax court in its action for declaratory relief. The tax court determined that PEL’s retirement plans did not qualify under I.R.C. § 401 because the plans covered individuals who were not employees of PEL. Thus, the requirement of § 401(a)(2) that a qualifying plan be for the “exclusive benefit” of the employer’s employees was not met. We Affirm.
FACTS
PEL is a for profit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho for the purpose of “leasing” management personnel, consultants, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Simpson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Fred Marvel and Angela Marvel, D/B/A Marvel Photo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Susan J. Mayors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Jimmie Ruth Daughtrey v. Honeywell, Inc., Bull Hn Information Systems, Talent Force, Inc., AKA Temp ForceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Michael D. Weber Barbara L. Weber v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Weber v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Matthews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- David W. Matthews and Christa Matthews, Ronald Davis and Marie Davis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.