Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 9, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 7:15-cv-109-KKCPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

KAREN K. CALDWELL, CHIEF JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) and the Department of the Treasury’s (“Treasury”) motions to dismiss. (DE 22; DE 23.) Plaintiff, Arnetia Robinson, is a private individual who *663claims her investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (“Companies”) were materially damaged when FHFA and Treasury entered into a 2012 amendment (“Third Amendment”) to existing Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (“PSPAs”). The plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief that would prevent enforcement of portions…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2017
  2. Roberts v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2017
  4. Akanthos Opportunity Fund, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Appaloosa Investment Limited Partnership I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API