Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2004No. S102371PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.(1) Defendant Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) contracts with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for the latter to provide retirement benefits to MWD’s employees. The single issue of law presented here is whether, under the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL) (Gov. Code, § 20000 et seq.)1 and MWD’s contract with CalPERS, MWD is required to enroll in CalPERS all workers who would be considered MWD’s employees under California common law. MWD contends it may exclude from enrollment workers, such as plaintiffs, who are paid…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McFarland v. Voorheis-Trindle Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Reynolds v. BementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  4. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API