Legal Opinion

Clark v. Norris

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1987No. 86-030PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This case was tried to a jury in the First Judicial District in and for Lewis and Clark County, Montana. The defendant doctor was found not negligent and the plaintiff patient appeals. We affirm.

Appellant, Valorie Clark, charged defendant, Dr. Tom Norris, with medical negligence due to the perforation of her uterus during the course of a surgical procedure known as a dilation and curettage (D&C), which also resulted in damage to her small intestine. At the time of the incident, December 5, 1979, Clark was a twenty-eight year old mother of two. About six weeks after she was diagnosed as…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  3. Soo Line Railroad Company v. Fruehauf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. FullerMontana Supreme Court · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cechovic v. Hardin & Associates, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Palmer Ex Rel. Diacon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Draggin' Y Cattle Co. v. AddinkMontana Supreme Court · 2013

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API