Legal Opinion

George Silentman v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 25, 1977No. 76-1192Published

1Opinion of the Court

566 F.2d 237

10 ERC 1796, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 345, 7

Envtl. L. Rep. 20,758

George SILENTMAN and Mary Silentman, Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent,

San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Southwest Gas Corporation,

Transwestern Pipeline Company, et al., and Navajo

Tribal Utility Authority, Intervenors.

No. 76-1192.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1977.

Decided Aug. 26, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 25, 1977.

Richard W. Hughes, Window Rock, Ariz., for petitioners.

Thomas M. Walsh, Atty., Federal Power Commission, Washington, D. C., with whom Drexel D. Journey,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Wright; Concurrence · Wright.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Henry v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Silentman v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API