Legal Opinion

N. M. Uranium, Inc. v. Moser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 1979No. 1443PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

Involved in this appeal is the construction of certain royalty provisions in an amendment to a uranium mining lease. Suit was instituted by N. M. Uranium, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation, hereinafter called “appellants,” against Margaret Lyne Moser, individually, and Margaret Lyne Moser and William Barnett Moser, Jr., as independent executors and testamentary trustees of the Estate of Catherine Carol Lyne, hereinafter called “appellees,” wherein all parties sought a construction of the questioned royalty provisions in the lease, as amended on April 1,1975.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Myers v. Gulf Coast Minerals Management Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barrand, Inc. v. Whataburger, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  2. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA v. Hudson Energy Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Swift Energy Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Walker v. Horine, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  5. Markert v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API