Legal Opinion

Trautman v. Ahlert

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1966No. 8327PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Chief Justice.

The defendant has appealed from an adverse judgment, and demands trial de novo.

The plaintiff is the owner of the West Half and the Northeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 139 North of Range 67 West. The defendant is the owner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 9. A dispute arose between them as to the location of the boundary between their respective lands. The plaintiff engaged a surveyor, who surveyed the boundaries. According to the boundaries as established by the survey, the defendant was farming a part of the plaintiff’s land. This was denied by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berger v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Rovenko v. BokovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bernier v. PreckelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Backhaus v. RenschlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Manz v. BoharaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Production Credit Ass'n of Mandan v. Terra Vallee, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. James v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API