Legal Opinion

Lawrence Savings Bank v. Garabedian

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 21, 2000No. 99-P-571PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

This appeal presents only one issue: whether a single justice of this court abused his discretion when he denied the defendants’ motion for a second enlargement of time in which to file their brief. We discern no abuse of discretion warranting relief.

Facts and procedural background. The case underlying the present appeal, Lawrence Savings Bank v. Garabedian, is cur*158rently pending in this court.5 We briefly rehearse the undisputed history of that appeal to provide some context for the issue presently before us.

On March 26, 1991, Lawrence Savings Bank (bank) filed suit against the defendants,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Monahan v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Tisei v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Troy Industries, Inc. v. Samson Manufacturing Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BarbozaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Godfrey v. Woburn Foreign MotorsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. TrussellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Moeder v. TolczykMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API