Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barboza

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 7, 2007No. 06-P-499PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfer, J.

The Commonwealth filed its present appeal after a single justice of this court allowed the defendant’s motion to extend the time for filing his notice of appeal. The Commonwealth claims that the notice was improperly allowed under Mass.R.A.P. 14 (b), as amended, 378 Mass. 939 (1979), because the defendant failed to establish “good cause” as required. The reason given by appellate counsel for the absence of a timely notice of appeal was that trial counsel had timely drafted and mailed a notice of appeal, but counsel did not follow up with the clerk to make sure it was received and docketed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. James P. Pasquale v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. Goldstein v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Bernard v. United Brands Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aimtek, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Lechoslaw v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. SalingerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. ClemensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. PhillipsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API