Legal Opinion

Brock Candy Co. v. Elson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 10, 1924No. 7 Div. 430PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a contest of claim for homestead exemption. The facts are not in dispute, and may be thus summarized: The property, a house and lot in the city of Gadsden, has been continuously occupied by the debtor as his homestead since 1916. The value is $3,500. In March, 1922, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the debtor and caused it to be duly registered. At that time the property was subject to two valid mortgages, both superior to the homestead right, one for $1,900 and one for $650. In October, 1922, the debtor, desiring to pay off the senior mortgage negotiated a loan of $1,-800…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollak v. McNeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. State v. BesanconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Franklin v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Steiner Bros. v. BerneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First Alabama Bank of Dothan v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Barber v. BeckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Terry v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API