Brock Candy Co. v. Elson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This is a contest of claim for homestead exemption. The facts are not in dispute, and may be thus summarized: The property, a house and lot in the city of Gadsden, has been continuously occupied by the debtor as his homestead since 1916. The value is $3,500. In March, 1922, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the debtor and caused it to be duly registered. At that time the property was subject to two valid mortgages, both superior to the homestead right, one for $1,900 and one for $650. In October, 1922, the debtor, desiring to pay off the senior mortgage negotiated a loan of $1,-800…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pollak v. McNeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- State v. BesanconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Franklin v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Steiner Bros. v. BerneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
3Cited by13 opinions
- First Alabama Bank of Dothan v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Davis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Barber v. BeckettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Terry v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.