Legal Opinion

Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. McCornack

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1952No. 31918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

The ultimate objective of this lawsuit is the consummation of a merger of Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc., into the Greyhound Corporation. Appellants seek to accomplish the stated objective under the provisions of Rem. Supp. 1949, § 3803-41 (RCW 23.16.160), by forcing minority shareholders of Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc. (apparently opposed to the merger), to sell their Northwest stock; and permitting its acquisition by The Greyhound Corporation at an appraised value, or price. Under the provisions of the above-mentioned statute, Northwest Greyhound Lines, Inc., petitioned the superior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Niagara Hudson Power Corp. v. LeventrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Plaut v. MunfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robblee v. RobbleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Farnsworth v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re Valuation of Common Stock of Libby, McNeill & LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Richardson v. Palmer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Matthew G. Norton Co. v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API