Legal Opinion

Holloman v. Black

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1916No. 615PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Leon County Court; C. D. Craig, Judge. Action by H. M. Black against J. B. Hol-loman for accounting. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Black sued Holloman for an accounting of partnership affairs between them. Upon trial, judgment was rendered in Black’s favor for $243.47, and Holloman appeals.

[1] The first assignment complains of the admission of evidence. The assignment cannot be considered, because it is not a copy of any paragraph in the motion for new trial filed by appellants. Chapter 136, Acts of 1913, p. 276 (Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, art. 1612) ; Shipp v. Cartwright, 182 S. W. 70; Overton v. K. of P., 163 S. W. 1053; Edwards v. Youngblood, 160 S. W. 288; Oil Co. v. Crawford, 184 S. W. 728.

[2] Even if the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Searcy v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Edwards v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Overton v. Colored Knights of PythiasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. McPhaul v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Progressive Oil Co. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garitty v. HalbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Barkley v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Mansfield v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Hassell v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API