Legal Opinion

McPhaul v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1915No. 728PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Terry County; W. R. Spencer, Judge. Suit by H. C. Byrd and others against L. W. MePhaul and others. From the judgment rendered, L. W. MePhaul brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

[1] The defendant in error H. C. Byrd moves to dismiss this appeal because the court has not jurisdiction of all the parties to the judgment. The suit was originally brought by Byrd against A. M. Ellis, L. W. MePhaul, A. E. MePhaul, and J. O. King, on three vendor’s lien notes for $97.50 each, together with interest and attorney’s fees. Note No. 4, given in part payment of section No. 22, block D-ll, certificate No. 27, S. K. & K., 640 acres, and notes Nos. 3 and 4 in part payment of section 8, block D-14, certificate 217, grantee Chicago & Milwaukee Railway Company, 640 acres. It is alleged…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. O'KeefeTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Murphy v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Vineyard v. McCombsTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Weems & Waldo v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Snell v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Ponca Wholesale Mercantile Co. v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. De Proy v. ProgakisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. United Employers Casualty Co. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Golden West Oil Co. No. 1 v. Golden Rod Oil Co. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API