Legal Opinion

Hanvey v. F. M. Formby Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1917No. 7 Div. 856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of Anniston; Thomas W. Coleman, Jr., Judge. Bill by the P. M. Formby Company and others against George Hanvey and others. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

It is unnecessary to restate the law applicable to a creditors’ bill to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of real property. The cases having application have been recently collected and discussed in McCrory et al. v. Donald, 192 Ala. 312, 68 South. 306. The testimony has been carefully considered, and without presumption in favor of the ruling' of the chancellor; and we are of the opinion that the correct conclusion was reached. The burden of proof was not discharged by the vendee. Thompson v. Tower Mfg. Co., 104 Ala. 140, 16 South. 116; Wooten v. Steele, 109 Ala. 563, 19 South. 972, 55 Am.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCrory v. DonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Wooten v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Thompson v. Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. British & American Mortgage Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cooke v. WilbanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API