Legal Opinion

Peppers Refining Co. v. Barkett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1953No. 35498PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This is a suit wherein the grantees in a “Sale of Oil and Gas Royalty” seek to quiet title, as against the successors in interest to their grantors, to an undivided one-half interest in the minerals underlying an 80-acre tract of land in Oklahoma county, Oklahoma. The parties will be. referred to as plaintiffs and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court.

By an instrument entitled “Sale of Oil and Gas Royalty,” dated September 8, 1925, George W. Carrico and Hattie B. Carrico conveyed to the plaintiffs, F. H. Barkett and George Carum,

“An undivided Va interest in all of the oil, gas, coal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meeks v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. White v. McVeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Witt v. WestheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. EckroatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Price v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Alfrey v. EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. North Silo Resources, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. Kirstin J. Deselms Singletree Land, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company Hugh Deselms Paul A. Woods Cheryl S. Woods Shelli R. Woods Cody S. Woods Charlotte Joan Hutton Hutton Family Partnership Mike Hutton and Hutton Minerals, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability companyWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Hurst v. ByarsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Ford v. RaabSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API