Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Byars

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1956No. 37191PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted on November 8, 1954, by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, to quiet their title to a described tract of land against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below. The parties will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designation.

In answer to the plaintiffs’ petition, which alleged the facts upon which they based their title, the defendant Hopkins answered, alleging himself to be the owner of an unpaid, recorded, purchase money mort gage executed by Pope Byars, deceased husband and father of the plaintiffs, and by Clarissa E. Byars, his wife, one of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peppers Refining Co. v. BarkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Burroughs v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mills v. ReneauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Abboud v. AbboudCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. McVey v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Ford v. RaabSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. RLM Petroleum Corp. v. EmmerichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API