Schwartz v. Gross
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
Robert Schwartz instituted an action in the Municipal Court of Akron, in which he asserted that Emil C. and Rose K. Cross (husband and wife) expressly warranted that a grand piano which they sold to him “was in good condition and had an excellent tone, and the plaintiff was induced to purchase said piano upon said representation.” The plaintiff further claimed that, at and before the sale, the piano was not in good condition, “by reason of it having a split in the sound bridge and a dry pin block, which prevented it from keeping in tune”; that the defects were not discovered until the elapse…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- McLennan v. OhmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Foote v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Meyer v. Packard Cleveland Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1922
- Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. Union Gin & Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Utah State Medical Ass'n v. Utah State Employees Credit UnionUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Risner v. Regal Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Acme Equipment Corp. v. Montgomery Co-operative Creamery Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Jones v. KellnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Evans v. WarwickLima Municipal Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.